Czar Struck

It seems that no one really knows how many czars Obama (may he live forever) has appointed.  I've heard 44, 33, 37.  It may change on a rotating basis of some sort.  Who knows?  In this "transparent" administration stuff is always going on behind the curtain.  What you can count on is the abrogation of your freedom.

The point is to have these rulers who can administrate policy without answering to Congress or the people of the United States.  Has anyone noticed that Obama (may he live forever) never asks people what they want?  He tells them.  How many times in a given speech can you count the phrase, "The Amercian people want..."  This, regardless of the polls which fly in the face of everything he says.  A greater liar we have yet to see grace the oval.  And we have had a few.

Well, here's one of his Rising Czars for now.  You be the judge.  This is John Holdren, Science Czar, from his book, Ecoscience.

"Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society."

"One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society."

"Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock. "


"Involuntary fertility control
...
A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.
...
The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births."

"If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility—just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource-consumption patterns—providing they are not denied equal protection."

 "In today's world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?"

There's much more of course.  So, those of you naive enough to vote for Obama (may he live forever), did you vote for this guy?  Actually yes you did.  You didn't know it because you didn't read between the lines.  You voted for a candidate about which no one knew anything, who refused to be properly vetted and received no scrutiny from the media; a man who, rather than debating the opposition, shut them up with intimidation and fear tactics carried out by his "supporters."  He maintains deniability by keeping his hands clean, letting his sycophants do the work, much like the old mafia dons.  You opened the door.  That released the imps, along with their Wannabe Messiah.

Scare tactics on my part?  Well let me ask you.  When one sees the tsunami coming that will annihilate the town and runs screaming through the streets for everyone to run, is that a scare tactic?  Maybe.  But you'd better listen.

On the other hand if the waters are placid and one runs screaming through the streets in the same way, what would you call that?  Eh, Al?  Al?  Are you listening?

Al?

Comments

[Lindsey Lulla]

Hi Les,

Reading these quotes make me feel sick. I heard about him briefly on Glenn Beck and was disturbed, but the more and more he's quoted the more and more I'm scared. Thanks for sharing this. Raj and I have missed your posts!

[Les]

Thank-you for responding, Lindsey! Yes, all of these czars are disturbing. It's argued that many presidents have appointed czars at varying occasions, but the number and ideological fanaticism of these is unprecedented.